Why Australia Has No MAJOR City In The North

australia is a huge country but while most of the country has at least one major city such as Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth and even Hobart its northern coastline does not this is a little odd because this region is so close to the primary shipping lanes connecting to Asia so why doesn’t Australia have a major city along its northern coastline and before anyone says Darwin is a major city it’s smaller than you probably think australia is a continent defined by its contradictions it’s huge but largely empty it’s surrounded by oceans yet much of its interior is bone dry it has some of the most livable cities in the world yet entire regions remain nearly uninhabited understanding the country’s physical geography helps explain why Australians have chosen to live where they do and why so few of them live along the country’s northern coast australia is the flattest continent on Earth lacking in towering mountain ranges or active volcanoes much of the interior is part of what’s known as the Australian Shield a stable and heavily eroded block of land that hasn’t seen mountain building activity in hundreds of millions of years this has left a landscape of broad plains shallow basins and weathered hills and in the center lies the outback a sweeping region of deserts and semi-arid scrubland that dominates the image most outsiders have of Australia but surrounding this harsh core is a more varied periphery where rainfall is more reliable and the soil somewhat more accommodating the Great Dividing Range which runs parallel to the east coast from Queensland down to Victoria captures moisture from prevailing ocean winds creating a relatively green corridor in an otherwise dry land major rivers like the Murray and Darling flow through this region albeit erratically in contrast the northern region of Australia presents a very different face than either the outback or the fertile southern areas it lies entirely within the tropics and is dominated by a tropical savannah climate in the west and center and a tropical monsoon climate in the northeast unlike the predictable seasons of the south the north swings between extremes months of searing heat and heavy rainfall during the wet season followed by long stretches of dryness during the rest of the year and when it rains it pours the monsoon can flood rivers and turn dusty plains into wetlands overnight but during the dry season those same wetlands vanish and water becomes scarce again the terrain of the north is equally challenging much of the land is flat and covered in coarse grasses and scattered trees but the soil quality is poor heavily leeched by centuries of tropical rain mangrove lined estuaries flood plains and escarments add further complexity to the land cyclones are another hazard regularly battering the coastlines of the Northern Territory and Northern Queensland with destructive winds and heavy rains now all this said Northern Australia is far from lifeless the region is home to incredible biodiversity including some of the last large relatively untouched tropical ecosystems in the world this of course also comes with some of the most dangerous wildlife and plants that humans have ever encountered one such plant commonly known as the stinging tree is so painful that victims are often in pain for months it’s considered to be the most venomous plant in the world by some metrics australia’s physical geography is extreme to say the least there’s a reason why it’s well known for its danger but then so are Indonesia and Southeast Asia so why did early British settlements focus so far away from the major colonies and trade networks of Asia of course it all starts with the Aboriginals of Australia once again I’ve ditched a sponsor for this video because I want to tell you guys all about my awesome Substack every week I write additional articles that go along with my weekly videos and it’s 100% free forever and always so go to geographic.substack.com to sign up and join this rapidly growing geography community long before the British ever set foot on the continent Aboriginal Australians had spent tens of thousands of years adapting to its diverse and often unforgiving landscapes but rather than building cities they lived in smaller mobile communities that moved with the seasons and the availability of food and water these patterns varied across the country of course and largely reflected the land itself in the fertile southeast and along some river systems Aboriginals could settle in place for longer periods in the arid interior survival required constant movement and deep environmental knowledge along the tropical north communities timed their lives to the rhythms of the wet and dry seasons adjusting their diets and their locations accordingly crucially Aboriginal settlement was not organized around permanent structures which would come to define British colonization instead it was deeply rooted in a relationship with the land shaped by dreamtime stories seasonal migration and stewardship practices the landscape wasn’t something to be conquered but rather something to be understood this kind of land use left very little physical evidence that European explorers would recognize as civilization even though these societies were very complex in their own ways when the British arrived in force in 1788 they brought with them a fundamentally different understanding of land settlement and development they were looking for harbors farmland freshwater and a temperate climate ideally all in one place the site of Sydney on the southeast coast checked many of those boxes it offered a sheltered harbor manageable weather nearby forest for timber and space to grow food melbourne further south had fertile land along the Yarao River and a cooler climate that was more familiar to British settlers perth founded on the southwest coast and Adelaide further along the south central shoreline also fit into this mold these cities became magnets for people looking to start a new life in a new part of the world some of whom were forced in fact the first settlement fleet carried 788 convicts leading to one of the most well-known if slightly overstated historic facts about Australia that it began its life as a penal colony the early Australian colonies were largely based on logistical decisions settlements were placed where supply ships could safely land where agricultural output could be maximized and where European vision of development could be imposed with relative ease australia at the time was Britain’s most remote colony which meant that it had to be self- sustaining in ways that not even the early North American colonies had to be of course the early British colonizers were keen to settle the North as well but those attempts rarely went smoothly early efforts in places like Port Essen and Raffles Bay both on the northern coast failed due to isolation disease and harsh conditions eventually Darwin would take root but it remained a small outpost more connected to its military role and proximity to Asia than to its economic clout or population size queensland stretching up the northeast coast did see more successful settlement particularly in Brisbane and later Kairens and Townsville but even these cities are located in the far southeast corner of the state or nestled along more protected segments of coastline the far north remained largely empty all told British settlements in Australia followed the path of least resistance reinforcing the natural gradients laid down by the physical geography the cities we know today didn’t emerge randomly they were products of environmental compatibility and colonial convenience settlers were not about to brave heat malaria flooding and isolation when more temperate navigable and productive land was available elsewhere which brings us to today all of these past issues have since been solved so why does Australia still not have any major cities in the north australia is a large country but it’s not a very populated one in fact as of 2025 the country is only home to about 28 million people this would make it the 54th largest country in the world by population but because of its massive size also a country with a very low population density at only 3.5 people per square km even Canada has 4.5 people per square kilometer so suffice it to say Australia’s population is more condensed than most other countries and this leaves vast areas of it with very few people but one place you might expect at least one large city would be along the northern coastline let’s look at a map the northern part of Australia is closer to Southeast Asia than Sydney or Melbourne it’s plain as day darwin is physically closer to Jakarta and Singapore than to Canbor the capital of Australia and in an era where global trade is dominated by ships moving through the Java and South China Sea and the ports of Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai northern Australia appears to sit in a prime location for both imports and exports almost like a southern gateway to Asia and yet the north remains largely empty dotted with small towns and isolated outposts why well to start it’s not like the idea hasn’t occurred to Australians in fact politicians military planners and economic developers have periodically floated proposals to open up the north or create a new northern capital but despite these ambitions no city has ever emerged on a scale even remotely comparable to Australia’s southern cities the reasons are many and they begin as they often do in Australia with geography the tropical north is one of the most climatically challenging regions of the country the wet season brings monsunal rains intense humidity and cyclones roads frequently wash out rivers flood infrastructure decays more quickly in the heat and damp then the dry season arrives stretching for months bringing dust fire risk and water shortages this climate rhythm while manageable for small populations or for industries like mining makes sustained urban growth difficult cities require reliable infrastructure predictable logistics and steady access to water and energy the North provides none of these easily even in 2025 the North’s remoteness is a problem it’s not just distance from other Australian cities it’s distance from the infrastructure backbone of the country there are few major highways limited rail connections and a thin web of utilities building and maintaining a city-scale system in such an environment requires enormous investment and for what in return the population base simply isn’t there to justify it without people there’s no market without a market there’s no business case and without a business case there’s no political will then there’s the environment itself much of the land along the north coast is ecologically sensitive home to wetlands mangroves and unique species it’s also home to some of the oldest continuous cultures on Earth aboriginal Australians have long lived in the north particularly in the Arnham land and the Kimberly regions that remain deeply significant in cultural and spiritual terms large-scale urban development would disrupt these landscapes and risk further marginalizing communities that already face a host of challenges there’s also the legal dimension much of the land in Northern Australia is held under forms of Aboriginal title or is subject to land rights claims any expansion plan would be complex controversial and contested so if the north is hard to build on distant from population centers and environmentally delicate what about the strategic upside being closer to Asia does have value darwin in particular has taken on an increasingly important role as a military hub hosting Australian forces and rotations of US Marines its port controversially leased to a Chinese company in 2015 for 99 years has become a symbol of geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific this grappling of US military and Chinese economic interests highlights the strategic importance of Australia’s northern region but strategic importance doesn’t automatically lead to population growth a city can be militarily vital and still remain small fairbanks Alaska for example is perhaps one of the most strategically important military locations for the United States but the city has and will remain fairly small even economic potential has its limits northern Australia is rich in minerals cattle and gas and has supported large-scale resource extraction for decades but these industries don’t necessarily require large cities to function mining towns rise and fall with commodity cycles workers fly in and fly out usually on monthsl long cycles investment comes in bursts not in steady flows that kind of boom and bust economy doesn’t build sustainable urban environments like those seen in Melbourne or Sydney basically it builds camps not cities in the end the logic of the south continues to dominate Australia where about 98% of Australia’s population lives the southeast corner in particular with its temperate climate deep water ports major rivers and large existing populations remains the natural heart of the country the original decisions made by early colonists to settle Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide and Perth weren’t just historic accidents they were decisions reinforced by geography climate and connectivity and in the north for all its potential it continues to remain on the periphery with just 2% of Australia’s entire population and no major cities darwin the largest city along the northern coastline is home to just 140,000 people and the north as a whole a little less than 600,000 in the end geography dictated the first settlements of Australia history cemented them in place and now even in an age of globalization and shifting trade routes the inertia of those early choices keeps Australia cities anchored far from its northern shores i know some of you will probably lean into the whole tropics thing for why there’s no city there but tropical cities tend to fare quite well actually in terms of population growth even Britain founded plenty of successful tropical cities such as modern Singapore australia in this regard is just different speaking of Australia this week and the two weeks before it I’ve been cruising around the country from the southwest to the outback and now Tasmania if you want to see what Australia’s geography is really like go check out those videos on my travel channel i hope you enjoyed learning all about Australia’s northern coast if you did why not check out this video all about why Indonesia is moving its capital and why it’s a disaster thanks for watching see you next time

🤠 Join me in Tasmania! https://youtu.be/xp9xcO-VEsE

📖 Subscribe to my Substack! 👉 https://geographicgeoff.substack.com 👈

🌳 Find me: https://linktr.ee/geoffgibson
🗺️ Map store: https://geoffxmuirway.com/

Australia is one of the largest countries in the world in terms of size. But it doesn’t have a large population. This means that it’s major cities are all fairly scatted in different parts of the country. But there’s something weird going on here: none of these major cities are on the northern coast which is far closer to Asia and the rest of the world.

In this video, we’ll cover the physical geography of Australia and how it differs from north to south. Then we’ll dive into the early human and British settlement of Australia. Finally, we’ll talk about the unique geographic constraints the north has that actively presents major cities from being established there, even in 2025.


Stock footage and music acquired from www.envato.com, www.storyblocks.com and videvo.net.

If you think there’s been an error in using a video clip, please contact me.

This has been a production of Sound Bight Media (soundbight.com)

22 Comments

  1. It’s too bloody hot in the summer, that’s why! From temperate Melbourne. Australia is only empty if you take a human centred view, it still has some of the most biodiverse places on Earth, precisely because it’s not yet overrun by humans. But our governments of both persuasions seem hellbent on destroying that.

  2. It should be strategic; being close to Asia means being close to China and in an hypothetical 3rd WW Australia will be the first target of China from the North especially…

  3. @14:10 The Brits didn't "found" modern successful Singapore, Brits left after the Japanese invaded during WW2 and post war, we initially wanted the British to come back to govern but you guys did not want to. We rebuilt on our own through good leadership. We ended up far better off on our own than if the Brits decided to come back.

  4. The abbos were only there a couple hundred years before the English turned up. The ones which are there now invaded and removed the original occupants

  5. Why in the hell would Australia at least one of their ports to China for 99 years…. That is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard considering how aggressive China has been in region

Leave A Reply