Ascensão e queda do Império Otomano (CC: POR/ENG/ESP/FRA/JAP/ITA)
The centuries preceding the formation of the Ottoman Empire were marked by profound transformation in Anatolia and the surrounding lands. Far from the great empires that once dominated the landscape, such as the Byzantine Empire, which was already showing signs of wear and tear, and the Abbasid Caliphate, whose glory was fading, a new power was germinating. Not in opulent cities or under the aegis of large bureaucracies, but in the steppes and mountains, with nomadic tribes moving in search of pastures and new frontiers. Anatolia, or Asia Minor, was a cultural and strategic melting pot. For centuries, it was the heart of the Byzantine Empire, the direct heir of Rome in the East. However, its power was in steady decline. Internal strife, the loss of territories to the Arabs, and, crucially, the arrival of new waves of Turkic peoples from Central Asia, had eroded its defenses and its authority. The Battle of Manzikert in 1071 was a watershed moment, opening the doors of Anatolia to mass Turkish migration. These Turkic peoples, for the most part, were Sunnis and saw themselves as defenders of the faith. Many operated under the ideal of Gazi, a kind of warrior of the faith, whose purpose was to expand the frontiers of Islam against the “infidels.” This ideology was not only religious but also practical: border warfare offered plunder, land, and prestige, attracting warriors and adventurers. As the Turks established themselves in Anatolia, several Rûm Sultanates (or of Rum, in reference to Rome/Byzantium) and small states known as beyliks emerged. They were independent of each other, often in conflict, but also united against external threats. Among these beyliks, one in particular would begin to stand out, located on the northwestern border of Anatolia, near the last Byzantine strongholds. It was into this volatile landscape that a tribal leader named Osman I emerged. His tribe, the Kayı, was relatively small but strategically located. Living on the fringes of the Byzantine Empire, they were on the front lines of Muslim expansion and the opportunity for plunder and conquest. Legend has it that Osman received a prophetic dream of a tree growing from his navel and covering the world with its branches, symbolizing the vast empire his lineage would build. Whether legend or fact, this vision would become a powerful narrative for his followers. The Ottomans, as they would come to be known (derived from Osman), knew like few others how to capitalize on the fragility of their neighbors. They lured fellow Gazi warriors and Turkish settlers with the promise of land and glory. Unlike other beyliks, who frequently engaged in internal strife, the Ottomans focused their energy on expanding westward toward Byzantine territories. With military cunning and a remarkable ability to incorporate diverse peoples and cultures under their banner, they planted the seeds that, within a few centuries, would become one of the largest and most enduring empires in history. The foundations for this monumental rise were laid on the borders, in the faith and determination of a tribe seeking its destiny. With the seeds planted on the Byzantine frontiers, the Ottoman state began to flourish under the visionary leadership of Osman I and, later, his son, Orhan. The transition from a mere tribe to an organized state marked the beginning of a remarkable rise. Osman, through a combination of military prowess and diplomatic skill, managed to unite numerous small Turkish tribes under his banner. His strategy was not only conquest but also integration, offering land and opportunities to those who joined his cause. A crucial milestone in the consolidation of Ottoman power was the capture of Bursa in 1326. It was not a spectacular battle, but a prolonged siege that culminated in the city’s surrender. Bursa, wealthy and strategically located, became the first Ottoman capital, serving as a vital administrative and military center. Its capture symbolized the shift from a merely predatory force to an established power with an urban center and a nascent infrastructure. It was there that the foundations for a more sophisticated government began to be laid, with the minting of coins and the construction of mosques and schools. The Ottomans’ continued success was due not only to their leadership but also to a crucial military innovation: the creation of the Janissaries. Initially, they were elite infantrymen, trained and loyal exclusively to the sultan. Recruited through the devşirme system (a collection of Christian children from the Balkans, educated, and converted to Islam), the Janissaries formed a professional and disciplined army, a force unparalleled in Europe at the time. Along with other military reforms, such as the organization of the cavalry and the strategic use of artillery, the Janissaries gave the Ottomans a decisive advantage on the battlefield. With an increasingly efficient military machine, Ottoman expansion turned to the Balkans. Under the command of sultans such as Murad I and Bayezid I, the empire rapidly advanced into southwestern Europe. The victories at Kosovo (1389) and Nicopolis (1396) sealed the fate of many Balkan kingdoms, which fell under Ottoman rule. The Ottoman system of government, which allowed a measure of local autonomy and religious freedom in exchange for taxes and loyalty, was often preferable to the rule of Christian feudal lords for the peasant populations. However, this meteoric rise suffered a devastating blow in 1402 with the Battle of Ankara. The formidable Turco-Mongol conqueror, Tamerlane, crushed the Ottoman army and captured Sultan Bayezid I himself. This defeat plunged the young empire into a period known as the Ottoman Interregnum, a decade of chaos and civil war between Bayezid’s sons for the throne. It seemed like the end of the Ottoman dream. But the empire proved surprisingly resilient. Under the leadership of Muhammad I, one of Bayezid’s sons, and later Murad II, order was restored. Muhammad I, known as “the Restorer,” worked tirelessly to reunify the lands, pacify factions, and rebuild the army. Murad II consolidated these conquests, defending the borders and setting the stage for what would be the Ottoman Empire’s greatest glory. The empire had survived its first major crisis, emerging stronger and more determined, ready for the next chapter in its extraordinary history. The 15th century called for a leader who could transcend previous Ottoman conquests and cement the empire as an indomitable force. That leader would be Muhammad II, a sultan with a bold vision and iron determination. From an early age, he dreamed of the impossible: the conquest of Constantinople, the ancient capital of the Byzantine Empire. For Muhammad, it was not just a military objective, but a mission that would seal the Ottoman destiny as heirs to Rome and leaders of the Islamic world. Preparations for the conquest were meticulous. Muhammad II knew that a direct attack would not suffice. He ordered the construction of the Rumelihisarı fortress on the European side of the Bosphorus, opposite the Anadoluhisarı fortress (built by his great-grandfather Bayezid I), cutting off Constantinople’s maritime supply. He also ordered the casting of gigantic cannons, including the famous “Basilisk,” capable of firing projectiles weighing hundreds of kilograms, an unprecedented siege weapon. He mobilized a colossal army and a naval fleet to blockade the city by sea. The Siege and Fall of Constantinople in 1453 is one of the most dramatic events in history. For 53 days, the city’s impregnable walls held out. Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos led the defense courageously, but the disparity of forces was overwhelming. The Ottomans attempted mines, escalades, and massive assaults, but the Byzantine defense held. Mehmed II’s moment of genius came when he ordered his ships dragged overland, over hills, into the Golden Horn Bay, bypassing the current and the chains that protected the entrance. This allowed a coordinated attack by land and sea, breaking through the final defenses. On the morning of May 29, the Ottomans invaded the city. The fall of Constantinople was not only a military victory, but a symbol of the transition of eras. With the capture of the city, Mehmed II, now known as “the Conqueror” (Fatih Sultan Mehmet), made Constantinople his new capital. Renamed Istanbul, the city underwent rapid reconstruction. The Hagia Sophia, the majestic Byzantine basilica, was converted into a mosque. and new mosques, markets, and fountains were built, symbolizing the new era. The revitalization of Istanbul as a political and cultural center reaffirmed Ottoman imperial legitimacy. Muhammad II, in conquering “New Rome,” claimed the mantle of Caesar, presenting himself not only as sultan but as Kayser-i Rum (Caesar of Rome), the successor to a millennia-old imperial line. This act elevated the Ottoman Empire to a universal status, not merely a Turkish state, but an empire that saw itself as the heir to past civilizations. Muhammad II’s post-conquest campaigns further consolidated the empire. He dedicated himself to the unification of Anatolia under Ottoman rule, eliminating rival beyliks, and expanded the Ottoman presence in the Balkans, annexing Serbia, Bosnia, and Albania. His vision of a vast , centralized empire was coming to fruition. Muhammad II not only conquered land; He laid the foundations for an administrative and legal structure that would allow the Ottoman Empire to thrive for centuries. The era of Ottoman apogee had arrived, and Istanbul was its splendid, beating heart. The sixteenth century saw the Ottoman Empire reach the zenith of its power and influence, cementing itself as a global superpower. Two sultans, in particular, were the architects of this golden period: Selim I the Terrible and his son, Suleiman the Magnificent. Selim I, a ruthless and strategic leader, dramatically expanded the empire’s borders to the south and east. His most significant campaign was the conquest of Egypt, Syria, and Arabia between 1516 and 1517. These victories not only added vast territories and riches to the empire but, crucially, brought the holy cities of Mecca and Medina under Ottoman rule. With this, the Ottoman sultan assumed the title of Caliph, the spiritual leader of all Sunni Muslims. This centralization of the Caliphate in Istanbul conferred unprecedented religious legitimacy on the Ottomans, strengthening their position as defenders of Islam and rulers of a universal empire. However, it was under the long and brilliant reign of Suleiman the Magnificent (also known as Suleiman the Lawgiver in the Islamic world) that the Ottoman Empire reached its apogee in terms of territorial expansion, military power, cultural development, and legislative power. His reign is often referred to as the Ottoman “Golden Age.” Suleiman continued expansion in all directions. The conquest of Belgrade in 1521 opened the way to Central Europe, and the capture of the island of Rhodes in 1522, home of the Knights Hospitaller, secured Ottoman control over the eastern Mediterranean. The culmination of land-based expansion in Europe came with the Battle of Mohács in 1526, which resulted in the fall of the Kingdom of Hungary. However, the Siege of Vienna in 1529 marked the limit of Ottoman expansion in Central Europe. Although they failed to take the city, the siege demonstrated the empire’s ability to project its power deep into the European continent. At sea, the Ottoman Navy, under the command of legendary admirals like Barbarossa, transformed the Mediterranean into an “Ottoman lake.” Naval victories and mastery of maritime trade routes not only ensured the security of the empire’s borders but also allowed it to project power beyond its traditional shores. Control of the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf established Ottoman influence over the trade routes connecting East and West, consolidating its wealth. The combination of an invincible land army and a formidable navy ensured that the Ottoman Empire was the dominant power of its era. The Ottoman frontier stretched from Budapest in Europe deep into the Middle East, encompassing vast territories in North Africa and the Caucasus. The height of power was not merely military; it was a reflection of efficient administration, a thriving economy, and a vibrant culture, which will be explored in detail in the next chapter. The golden age of the Ottoman Empire under Suleiman the Magnificent was defined not only by military conquests, but also by a complex and sophisticated government structure, a vibrant society, and a vibrant cultural production. The empire was a tapestry of peoples, religions and traditions, skillfully woven under the aegis of Ottoman administration. At the center of the power structure was the Sultan, who exercised absolute authority as head of state, military chief, and religious leader. However, he did not rule alone. The Grand Vizier was the Sultan’s chief minister, acting as his right-hand man and head of the Imperial Divan, the governing council that met regularly to discuss matters of state, legislation, and administration. The Divan was composed of viziers, military chiefs, judges, and other high-ranking officials, ensuring that decisions were made after deliberation among the different spheres of government. This structure allowed for a centralized and efficient administration of a vast territory. One of the most notable features of Ottoman society was the Millet System. This system allowed non-Muslim religious communities (Orthodox Christians, Armenians, Jews, among others) to live under their own laws and religious leaders, with a significant degree of autonomy. Each millet was responsible for its own internal affairs, such as marriage, inheritance, and education, in exchange for loyalty to the sultan and the payment of specific taxes. This system of religious coexistence, while not without its challenges, contributed to relative social stability in such a diverse empire and is a testament to the pragmatic Ottoman approach to governing heterogeneous populations. The empire’s wealth and stability during the Golden Age fueled an extraordinary flowering of Ottoman architecture and art. The name of Mimar Sinan, the chief imperial architect, became synonymous with genius. His mosques, bridges, and building complexes, such as the Süleymaniye Mosque in Istanbul, are masterpieces of proportion and harmony, combining Byzantine, Persian, and Islamic influences to create a distinctly Ottoman style. Beyond monumental architecture, the arts of calligraphy, miniatures, and ceramics reached new heights of sophistication, with intricate patterns and vibrant colors adorning palaces, books, and everyday objects. Literature and science also flourished. Poets like Fuzulî and Baki created works that resonate to this day, while Ottoman scholars and scientists continued the Islamic tradition of learning, with advances in fields such as astronomy, medicine, and mathematics. Libraries and madrassas (Islamic schools) were centers of knowledge, attracting scholars from across the empire and beyond. The Ottoman Empire sat at the crossroads of important trade routes, controlling access between East and West. Caravans brought spices, silk, and other luxury goods from Asia, while maritime trade in the Mediterranean and Red Seas was vital to the economy. Ottoman cities, with their vibrant bazaars and caravanserais, were centers of commercial and cultural exchange, attracting merchants and travelers from all over the world. Daily life in the empire was governed by a complex web of customs and traditions. The patriarchal family structure was the norm, and city life was organized around neighborhoods, with their mosques, markets, and public baths (hammam). Religious festivals, weddings, and official ceremonies marked the rhythm of social life, while coffee and tea became popular beverages, bringing people together in communal spaces. In its golden age, the Ottoman Empire was not only a military colossus but also a center of civilization, home to a dynamic society and a rich culture, whose innovations and traditions would leave an indelible mark on world history. The glorious heyday of the Ottoman Empire, marked by the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, began to give way to a period of stagnation and, eventually, decline in the 17th century. The seeds of this decline were sown not by a single catastrophe, but by a combination of internal and external factors that gradually eroded the foundations of the once-invincible empire. One of the most significant factors was the succession of less capable sultans. After Suleiman, the tradition of warrior sultans and strong leaders was replaced by a pattern of rulers who, with few exceptions, lacked the military and political experience of their predecessors. The succession system, which often involved the seclusion of princes in the “Kafes” (the “Cage”), a type of gilded prison within the palace, resulted in sultans isolated from the government and the realities of the empire. This paved the way for the rise of the Grand Viziers, the palace bureaucracy, and, unfortunately, corruption and nepotism. Merit, which had previously been the basis for advancement in Ottoman service, began to be replaced by family ties and bribery, weakening institutions and administrative efficiency. The Ottoman economy also faced a growing economic crisis. The discovery of the Americas and the shift in global trade routes diverted the flow of wealth that had previously passed through Ottoman lands. The vast amount of silver arriving in Europe caused rampant inflation that devalued the Ottoman currency. Furthermore, maintaining a massive army and constant military campaigns, although victorious, were extremely expensive, draining the state coffers. The inability to adapt to new European economic realities and resistance to technological innovations also contributed to this financial fragility. Internally, the empire began to feel the effects of revolts and internal instability. The Janissaries, once the backbone of Ottoman military power, became an increasingly turbulent force. As the recruitment system changed and they gained the right to marry and have children, their loyalty waned and their political influence grew. They became a kind of “state within a state,” often instigating mutinies and deposing sultans in pursuit of their own interests. Distant provinces also became more autonomous, and local revolts, motivated by taxes or mismanagement, became more frequent. Despite internal challenges, the Ottoman Empire remained a force to be reckoned with, but the limits of its expansion became painfully clear with the Siege of Vienna in 1683. For the second time in just over a century and a half, the Ottomans laid siege to the capital of the Holy Roman Empire. However, the siege ended in a crushing defeat for the Ottomans, who were repelled by a coalition of European forces. This battle was not just a military defeat; it was a symbolic watershed. It marked the beginning of the Ottoman territorial retreat in Europe and the end of the perception that the empire was an inevitable threat to the heart of the European continent. The 17th century was, therefore, a period of transition. The glories of the past were still evident, but the foundations of the empire showed cracks. Ineffective administration, economic challenges, and increasing military indiscipline paved the way for the territorial losses and loss of prestige that would characterize the following centuries. The Ottoman Empire was entering a new phase, in which the defense of its borders would become its primary concern. The 18th century marked an undeniable period of decline for the Ottoman Empire. What had been signs of stagnation in the previous century now turned into concrete losses and growing challenges. The once-fearsome Ottoman war machine could no longer keep pace with the emerging European powers, and the consequences were felt directly on the empire’s borders. The Peace of Karlowitz in 1699 was a grim milestone. After a series of military defeats against the Holy League (formed by Austria, Poland, Venice, and Russia), the empire was forced to sign a treaty that resulted in the first major permanent territorial losses in Europe. Hungary, Transylvania, and other regions were ceded, signaling that the era of Ottoman expansion in Europe was definitively over. It was the beginning of a process of retreat that would last centuries. By this time, a new and formidable threat was emerging in the east: Russia. Under Peter the Great and later Catherine the Great, the Russian Empire expanded aggressively southward, seeking access to the Black Sea and eventually the Mediterranean. The Russo-Turkish Wars became a constant feature of the geopolitical landscape, with the Ottomans often at a disadvantage due to Russia’s military modernization. The Treaty The 1774 decree of Küçük Kaynarca was particularly humiliating. It not only formalized the loss of Crimea, a strategic peninsula in the Black Sea, but also granted Russia the right to “protect” Orthodox Christians within the Ottoman Empire. This clause would become a frequent pretext for future Russian interference in Ottoman internal affairs, opening a wound that would never heal. Faced with growing external pressure and the undeniable evidence of their military and administrative inadequacy, some sultans and Grand Viziers recognized the need for change. Timid reforms began, primarily in the military. Attempts were made to modernize the army, introduce European techniques and weaponry, and reform the bureaucracy. However, these reforms were often resisted by conservative factions, such as the Janissaries, who saw the innovations as a threat to their own position and privileges. This internal resistance, combined with a lack of resources and systemic inertia, limited the depth and effectiveness of change. At the same time, the Ottoman Empire was not isolated from the intellectual currents sweeping Europe. Contact with the Enlightenment and the ideas of popular sovereignty, nationalism, and individual rights began to penetrate the Ottoman elites, challenging the traditional, autocratic order. Although this influence was limited in the eighteenth century, it would sow the seeds for more radical reform movements in the following century. In short, the eighteenth century was a period of painful transition. The Ottoman Empire, once a ruthless conqueror, found itself on the defensive, struggling to maintain its borders and its relevance on the international stage. Territorial losses, the emergence of new threats, and the inability to implement effective reforms paved the way for an even steeper decline in the following centuries. The “Eastern Question”—the dilemma of what to do with the “sick man of Europe”—began to dominate the agendas of the European powers. The 19th century opened with the Ottoman Empire immersed in what the European powers began to call the “Eastern Question”—the dilemma of how to deal with the slow disintegration of a vast and strategic empire. Ottoman weakness was not merely an internal concern; it became a stage for rivalries between the great powers, which coveted its territories or sought to influence its fate. One of the most powerful drivers of disintegration was the rise of growing nationalisms in the Balkans. Inspired by the French Revolution’s ideas of self-determination and centuries of resentment under Ottoman rule, peoples such as Serbs, Bulgarians, Romanians, and, notably, the Greeks, began to fight for their independence. The Greek War of Independence (1821–1829) was a catalyst. With the enthusiastic support of European powers such as Great Britain, France , and Russia—who saw the Greek cause as a romantic ideal and a strategic opportunity— Greece gained its independence. The loss of Greece was a painful blow to Ottoman prestige and a dangerous precedent for the other nationalities within the empire. The “Eastern Question” deepened as the European powers played a complex chess game over the future of the Ottoman Empire. Russia desired access to the straits (the Dardanelles and the Bosporus) and the Mediterranean, presenting itself as the protector of Orthodox Christians. Great Britain and France, for their part, feared Russian advance and sought to preserve the integrity of the Ottoman Empire as a buffer against Russian expansion in the Middle East and India. This constant rivalry , while at times “protecting” the empire from total collapse, also kept it in a state of dependence and vulnerability. Faced with such challenges, the Ottoman Empire embarked on an ambitious reform program known as the Tanzimat Reforms (1839–1876). The term “Tanzimat” means “reorganization” and reflects the intention to modernize the state, the army, and the educational system along Western lines. The reforms included the creation of a modern conscription-based army and the introduction of a more equitable legal system. (with the promise of equality before the law for all subjects, regardless of their religion), the secularization of education, and the development of a postal and communications system. The goal was to strengthen the empire internally to resist external pressures, adopting the tools of modernity without, ideally, relinquishing its Islamic identity. The Tanzimat, however, were top-down reforms, and their implementation faced resistance from conservative elements and practical problems. However, they created a new type of educated and Westernized elite, the Young Ottomans. This new intelligentsia, influenced by liberal and constitutionalist ideas, began to push for deeper political reforms, including the adoption of a constitution and a parliament, limiting the sultan’s absolute power. The complexity of the “Eastern Question” became evident in the Crimean War (1853–1856). In this conflict, Great Britain and France, fearing Russian advances, allied with the Ottoman Empire to combat Russia. Despite being victorious, the Ottoman Empire emerged from the war financially exhausted and even more dependent on European loans, which would lead to its inevitable economic subjugation. The 19th century was, therefore, a period of paradoxes for the Ottoman Empire: a time of decline and territorial loss, but also of sincere attempts at modernization and reform. The struggle to preserve its existence in a rapidly changing world, while contending with internal and external forces, would define the character of its final days. The late 19th century, although marked by the reformist ambitions of the Tanzimat, culminated in a period of renewed autocracy under the reign of Abdulhamid II (1876–1909). Ascending the throne at a time of profound political and financial crisis, Abdulhamid initially promised a constitution but quickly suspended it, inaugurating a regime that combined traditional despotism with elements of modernity in favor of the centralization of power. Abdulhamid II ruled with an iron fist, fearing both the intrusion of European powers and the growing liberal and nationalist tendencies within his own empire. He established a vast spy network to monitor dissidents and suppress any opposition. Paradoxically, despite his authoritarianism, he also continued to invest in modern infrastructure, such as the construction of railways (notably the Hejaz Railway, connecting Damascus to Medina), schools, and telegraph lines. His intention was to strengthen the state’s central control over the provinces and improve communication for administrative and military purposes, not to promote civil liberties. To combat the European nationalisms that were tearing his empire apart, Abdulhamid II actively promoted the ideology of Pan-Islamism. This doctrine sought to unite all Muslims worldwide under the leadership of the Ottoman Caliph, the sultan himself. The idea was to create a common Islamic identity that transcended ethnic and national divisions, appealing to religious solidarity to strengthen loyalty to the empire and resist Western influence. This policy had some success, especially among the Muslim populations of the Middle East, but failed to stem the rise of Christian nationalism in the Balkans. Territorial losses continued relentlessly. Bosnia and Herzegovina was annexed by Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria declared full independence, and Cyprus was leased (and later annexed) to Great Britain. With each defeat and loss, the empire shrank, becoming increasingly like a “sick man” in the eyes of Europe. The financial crisis reached its peak. The massive loans contracted during the Tanzimat to finance reforms and wars bankrupted the empire. In 1881, the Ottoman Public Debt Administration was established, placing much of the empire’s finances under the direct control of European creditors. This economic subjugation further limited Ottoman sovereignty and the sultan’s ability to act independently on the international stage. However, even in this period of despotism, limited modernization and contact with the West continued to foster the development of new elites and the growth of minorities and the conflict with them. Intellectuals and military personnel who had studied in Europe or in Westernized schools within the empire began to question the autocracy. Ethnic and religious tensions worsened, especially in the Balkans and the eastern provinces, where persecutions and massacres of minorities (such as the Armenians, especially in the 1890s) foreshadowed greater tragedies to come. The reign of Abdulhamid II, although it provided a period of relative internal stability (through repression), was a desperate attempt to contain forces that already outnumbered the empire. Despotism and Pan-Islamism were tools to postpone the inevitable, but the Ottoman Empire continued to wither under the weight of its contradictions and relentless external and internal pressure. The early 20th century found the Ottoman Empire in a state of terminal crisis, squeezed between the despotism of Abdulhamid II and the growing pressure of foreign powers. However, a new force was brewing within the empire: the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), better known as the Young Turks. Composed of military officers, intellectuals, and exiles, most of them Western-educated, they championed modernization, constitutionalism, and Turkish nationalism as the only hope for saving the empire. Frustration with Abdulhamid II’s autocratic regime and the empire’s humiliating weakness reached a boiling point. In 1908, the Young Turk Revolution broke out. Led by figures such as Enver Pasha, Talat Pasha, and Cemal Pasha, young army officers revolted and demanded the restoration of the suspended 1876 Constitution. Faced with the threat of a march on Istanbul, Abdulhamid II relented, and the constitution was indeed restored, marking the end of his autocratic reign and the beginning of a new era of parliamentary , multi-party politics—at least in theory. However, the euphoria of the revolution was short-lived. The constitutional restoration triggered a series of disastrous events that further undermined the empire’s already fragile territorial integrity. Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria declared full independence, and Crete united with Greece. In 1911, the Italo-Turkish War resulted in the loss of Libya, the last major Ottoman possession in Africa. The most devastating blow came with the Balkan Wars (1912–1913). A coalition of Balkan states—Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece, and Montenegro—formerly Ottoman subjects, united to expel the empire from its last European possessions. Within a short period, the Ottoman Empire lost almost all of its territories in the Balkans, including the important city of Thessaloniki, and was relegated to a small portion of Thrace. This humiliating defeat, which reduced the empire to its Anatolian and Arab borders, was a profound shock to the Ottoman elite and the population. Territorial losses and internal instability strengthened the more radical and nationalist faction of the Young Turks, who gradually assumed full control of the government. The ideal of a multiethnic empire was replaced by a growing Turkish nationalism, which sought to create a cohesive identity centered on Turkish ethnicity and culture. This shift in focus, while seen as an attempt to strengthen what remained of the empire, also exacerbated tensions with non-Turkish minorities, especially Arabs and Armenians. Despite initial promises of democracy and equality, internal tensions and the growing authoritarianism of the Young Turks manifested themselves in the repression of dissent and the increased centralization of power. The climate of distrust and persecution against minorities intensified, creating a powder keg that would explode with the outbreak of World War I. The Ottoman Empire, under the leadership of the Young Turks, was on the verge of a fateful decision that would seal its ultimate fate. The Ottoman Empire’s ultimate fate was sealed on the battlefields of World War I. Although the empire had been in decline for centuries, the global conflict of 1914–1918 was the fatal blow that resulted in its dissolution. The decision to enter the war was not unanimous, but the dominant faction of the Young Turks, led by Enver Pasha, saw an alliance with the The Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary) offered a chance to regain prestige and territory, especially against their former archrival Russia. The German promise of military and technological support, and the opportunity to redefine the balance of power in the Middle East, were crucial to this choice. In October 1914, after a naval attack on Russian ports in the Black Sea, the Ottoman Empire launched the war. The empire found itself engaged on multiple and challenging main fronts. In the Caucasus, it fought the Russian Empire in brutal weather conditions, suffering heavy casualties. In Mesopotamia, it defended itself against the British advance to protect oil fields and routes to India. The Gallipoli campaign (1915–1916) was a crucial victory for the Ottomans, repelling an Allied landing aimed at capturing Istanbul and opening a supply route to Russia. However, the Levant front, with the British-backed Arab rebellion, saw the Ottomans gradually lose control of their Arab provinces. Amid the chaos of war, the Ottoman Empire committed one of the greatest atrocities of the 20th century: the Armenian Genocide. Fearing that the Armenian (Christian) population in the east of the empire might ally with Russia, and driven by heightened Turkish nationalism, the Young Turks orchestrated mass deportations and systematic murders that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands, possibly over a million, Armenians. This grim event remains an open wound in Turkish and world history. As the war progressed, the attrition proved unsustainable. The Arab Revolt, instigated and supported by the British (with figures such as T.E. Lawrence, “Lawrence of Arabia”), dealt significant blows to the empire’s Arab provinces. With the promise of an independent Arab state, Arab leaders joined forces against Ottoman rule, resulting in the dissolution of the Arab provinces and the formation of new post-war British and French kingdoms and mandates. By 1918, Ottoman military collapse was imminent. Exhausted by four years of fighting on multiple fronts, with its army decimated, its finances depleted, and its population starving, the empire no longer had the capacity to fight. Allied forces advanced relentlessly, and final defeat was only a matter of time. The Armistice of Mudros, signed on October 30, 1918, marked the end of hostilities for the Ottoman Empire. The terms of the armistice were punitive, allowing the Allies to occupy strategic territories and control the Ottoman armed forces. It was the end of an empire that had shaped history for more than six centuries, but the legacy of its fall would still echo in the founding of a new nation. With the signing of the Armistice of Mudros in 1918, the Ottoman Empire’s six-century existence officially came to an end. What followed was a period of chaos and uncertainty, with the victorious Allied Powers—Great Britain, France, Italy, and Greece—seeking Allied occupation and the partition of the empire’s territories, as agreed in secret wartime treaties. Istanbul, the former imperial capital, was occupied, and Ottoman sovereignty seemed to have completely disappeared. However, from the ashes of the empire arose a new leader, a war hero and visionary: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. He refused to accept defeat and humiliation. He launched the Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922), leading a nationwide resistance against the occupying forces and against the Ottoman government itself, which had become a puppet of the Allies. The War of Independence, fought with fierce determination, culminated in the expulsion of foreign forces from Anatolia. With military victory, Mustafa Kemal took the decisive steps toward founding a new state. In 1922, the sultanate was abolished, ending the line of Osman, which had ruled for over six hundred years. In 1923, the Republic of Turkey was proclaimed, with Ankara as its new capital, symbolizing a radical break with the imperial past. Finally, in 1924, the caliphate was also abolished, ending the last vestige of the global Islamic authority that the Ottoman sultan-caliph had represented. Under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal (who later (surnamed “Atatürk,” Father of the Turks), the newly born republic embarked on an ambitious program of Kemalian Reforms. The goal was to transform Turkey into a modern, secular, and Westernized nation-state. The reforms included the secularization of the state, with the separation of religion and politics; the adoption of a new legal code based on European models; the replacement of the Arabic alphabet with the Latin alphabet; equal rights for women; and the promotion of public education and Western culture. It was a top -down cultural revolution, aimed at breaking with the Ottoman past and embracing a modern Turkish national identity. The Ottoman legacy is complex and multifaceted, and continues to influence modern Turkey and the world in various ways. In Turkey, the debate over the empire and its place in national identity remains lively. There is recognition of the empire’s greatness, its contribution to architecture, art, and knowledge, but also the need to address the darker aspects of its history, such as ethnic tensions and the tragic events of the late imperial period. On the global stage, the Ottoman Empire left an indelible mark. Its cultural influence can be seen in the architecture of the Balkans, the cuisine of the Middle East, and the music of North Africa. Sinan’s architectural influence, for example, is admired and studied worldwide. Politically, the dissolution of the empire reshaped the map of the Middle East, leading to the formation of new nation-states and, in many cases, the creation of artificial borders that continue to be a source of conflict and instability to this day. The “Eastern Question” evolved into the modern geopolitical challenges in the region. Thus, the rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire is not simply a story of power and decline, but a testament to the complexity of civilizations, human adaptability, and the profound and lasting consequences of their legacies. Today’s Turkey is a direct product of this history, but the empire’s echoes resonate far beyond its borders.
Os séculos que antecederam a formação do Império Otomano foram de profunda transformação na Anatólia e nas terras que a rodeavam. Longe dos grandes impérios que outrora dominavam o cenário, como o Bizantino, que já mostrava sinais de desgaste, e o Califado Abássida, cuja glória desvanecia, um novo poder estava germinando. Não em cidades opulentas ou sob a égide de grandes burocracias, mas nas estepes e montanhas, com tribos nômades que se moviam em busca de pastagens e novas fronteiras.
A Anatólia, ou Ásia Menor, era um caldeirão cultural e estratégico. Por séculos, foi o coração do Império Bizantino, herdeiro direto de Roma no Oriente. No entanto, o seu poder estava em declínio constante. As lutas internas, a perda de territórios para os árabes e, crucialmente, a chegada de novas ondas de povos turcos vindo da Ásia Central, haviam corroído suas defesas e sua autoridade. A Batalha de Manzikert em 1071 foi um divisor de águas, abrindo as portas da Anatólia para a migração turca em massa.
Seja membro deste canal e ganhe benefícios:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjcx9uaNIU2iujRW6cEG8lg/join
#História #educação